Menu

USB-C Charger Ripple Reports: Which Measurements Can You Compare?

A smaller ripple number is useful only when you know what was measured. Keep the charger’s operating conditions and the laboratory’s measurement setup beside every result.

Example of an unbranded smartphone, USB-C cable and charger on a desk.

Compare USB-C charger ripple values only after matching the operating conditions and measurement setup. For an accessory buyer, ranking two reports with missing conditions risks the wrong purchase decision. A missing bandwidth setting or an unspecified output mode leaves that decision open.

Two white single-port chargers sit beside blank sheets and a pencil on a wood desk.

Two white single-port chargers sit beside blank sheets and a pencil on a wood desk.

Copy this power supply ripple measurement checklist

Use one column per report. Copy conditions from the report itself, with a page or capture reference. Leave missing information blank or write Unknown / verify on the unit. The empty cells below are a working record, not results for any charger.

Scroll horizontally to see all columns if needed.

Report field Report A Report B Evidence to retain
Charger model, hardware revision and sample identifier ________ ________ Report identification and label photo
Laboratory, report date and method revision ________ ________ Full report and method reference
Selected USB-C port and actual output mode ________ ________ Negotiated mode record; fixed or programmable operation
Output voltage and load current during capture ________ ________ Setpoints and recorded operating values
Load type and state ________ ________ Electronic load or device; steady load or load change
Other occupied ports and their loads ________ ________ Port connection record
AC input voltage/frequency and temperature conditions ________ ________ Test conditions and stabilization record
Cable, breakout fixture and exact measurement point ________ ________ Setup photo or connection drawing
Probe model, attenuation and signal/return path ________ ________ Probe details and connection close-up
Oscilloscope model, input impedance and sensitivity ________ ________ Instrument settings and noise-floor check
Bandwidth limits, external filters and added capacitors ________ ________ Values, locations and filter settings
Coupling or offset method ________ ________ AC/DC setting, offset and relevant filter information
Acquisition mode, timebase, sample rate and observation interval ________ ________ Capture settings and averaging, if used
Result, units and definition ________ ________ Peak-to-peak or RMS; ripple alone or ripple plus noise
Acceptance criterion and its source ________ ________ Applicable specification, revision, clause and test conditions

Our recommendation is to resolve missing conditions before using a report to choose between products. A blank field does not establish that a charger failed; it establishes that the report has not answered that part of the comparison.

Match the USB-C operating state first

Record the output mode used during the capture, rather than copying the maximum wattage on the box. USB-IF’s Power Delivery overview explains that devices can negotiate the power they need. The USB-C PD guide explains how the available profiles, device request and cable fit together.

For this worksheet, ask the laboratory to identify the selected port, whether the output was fixed or programmable, the voltage during acquisition and the load current. For a programmable-mode capture, retain the requested operating point and whether it remained steady. “USB-C charger tested” leaves those fields unresolved.

Keep a steady-load ripple capture separate from a trace taken during a load change. Ask which event the reported maximum belongs to. Also record other connected devices: the multiport power-sharing guide explains why the port combination belongs in the operating record.

A black cable connects a white two-port charger to a phone with its screen off; the second charger port is empty.

A black cable connects a white two-port charger to a phone with its screen off; the second charger port is empty.

Treat input supply, temperature and stabilization as comparison fields too. These are editorial record-keeping recommendations: this page specifies no universal warm-up duration or ambient temperature. Ask for the method the laboratory actually followed.

Check where and how the signal was measured

Ripple is the AC variation on a DC output. Texas Instruments’ SSZTB25 article shows that an extended probe ground loop can pick up noise. Analog Devices’ AN-1144 likewise demonstrates switching-transient artifacts caused by a long ground lead.

That makes the connection photo useful evidence, rather than decoration. Ask where the signal and return connected, which probe was used and how its return path was arranged. A screenshot with a number but no connection details leaves a plausible source of measurement error unresolved.

A black probe, a small metal ground spring and a separate looped ground lead rest on a gray workbench.

A black probe, a small metal ground spring and a separate looped ground lead rest on a gray workbench.

The measurement point matters as well. Flex’s Design Note 022, page 3, discusses distribution effects, external capacitance and probe position. Applied to a USB-C report review, our recommendation is to distinguish a measurement at the charger connector from one at the far end of a cable or breakout fixture. Retain any added capacitor or filter in the record. Do not assume two fixtures are equivalent because they both connect to USB-C.

These manufacturer notes discuss converters and evaluation circuits. Their probing examples are reasons to request evidence from a qualified laboratory; they are not instructions to open a mains charger or a USB-C compliance fixture specification.

Match bandwidth, coupling and the meaning of the number

Bandwidth: Flex DN022 describes several filtering methods, including a 20 MHz bandwidth limit, and shows that the selected method changes its example readings. That is a documented measurement condition, not a universal pass/fail limit for USB-C chargers. If one report uses a bandwidth limit and another leaves it unspecified, request a matched method before ranking their results.

Coupling and sensitivity: Tektronix’s probing application note explains that AC coupling blocks the DC component and can also exclude slow drift. It also discusses probe attenuation and sensitivity when observing small ripple signals. Record coupling, offset, probe attenuation and instrument settings; ask how the lab checked its measurement noise floor. An AC-coupled ripple capture alone does not establish the DC output level.

Units and content: Peak-to-peak records the span between the observed minimum and maximum; RMS is a different measure. Retain the exact statistic and units. Also ask whether switching spikes are included: Flex DN022 distinguishes the ripple component from higher-frequency noise that can add to a combined peak-to-peak reading. Do not silently turn a “ripple and noise” figure into “ripple only.”

Preserve the acquisition mode and observation interval beside the screenshot. For this checklist, those fields document what the lab observed; the page does not prescribe a sample rate or an averaging setting. A cropped image without its settings is insufficient evidence for a close comparison.

Decide whether the reports are comparable

Scroll horizontally to see all columns if needed.

What the evidence shows Decision Next action
Both reports document equivalent operating states, measurement points, methods and result definitions Compare for those stated conditions Keep the conditions beside the numbers; do not extend the ranking to untested modes
A condition is missing, such as probe return path, bandwidth or negotiated mode Insufficient evidence Request the missing record or a matched repeat test
Conditions are known to differ, such as different ports, loads or filters Different tests Ask the laboratory for results under one agreed method
A supplier writes “pass” without identifying the criterion Pass claim cannot be checked Request the specification, revision, clause and applicable setup

Hypothetical report review: Report A documents a fixed output, a steady electronic load and a stated bandwidth limit. Report B says only “maximum output, low ripple.” Even if B prints a smaller number, its operating mode, load and measurement chain remain unknown. Record “insufficient evidence” and request those details. This example assigns no readings to either product.

Comparability is narrower than product approval. A ripple result does not, by itself, establish electrical safety, charging speed, battery life or the cause of a device fault. For the wider purchase record, use the GaN charger specification checklist and the Charging & Power topic guide.

Ask your supplier for a complete report record

Copy this request and fill in your model and intended operating state:

Please provide the complete laboratory ripple/noise report for model and revision ________, sample ________. Identify the selected port, actual USB-C output mode, voltage, load current, other occupied ports, AC input and temperature conditions. Include the measurement point and fixture photo, probe and return-path details, oscilloscope settings, bandwidth and external filtering, coupling or offset, acquisition settings, units and result definition. For any pass/fail statement, identify the applicable specification and clause. Mark conditions that were not recorded as unknown.

Send that request to your own supplier or testing laboratory. Keep the returned evidence with the purchase specification; do not fill missing cells from another model’s report.

How this guide was prepared

Desk research with AI assistance, using primary documents fetched on 16 October 2026. The report worksheet and comparison decisions are editorial recommendations derived from documented measurement limitations. No charger was opened or tested for this guide; the photographs contain no measured results. Unit-specific readings and acceptance limits remain unknown until supported by the relevant laboratory report and applicable specification.

Sources and further reading

Found an error? See our corrections policy and research methodology.